Jump to
Main Blog Regulation SEC says Impact Theory’s NFTs are securities

SEC says Impact Theory’s NFTs are securities

Pic 1

On August 28, the SEC filed charges against media company Impact Theory for "conducting an unregistered offering of crypto asset securities in the form of purported non-fungible tokens (NFTs)". This is the regulator's first enforcement action related to NFTs.

 

Details of the SEC vs. Impact Theory charge

According to a press release by the SEC, Impact Theory released a "Founder's Keys" NFT collection in 2021, raising up to $30 million through the sales. The regulator states that the promotion looked like an investment in the business, suggesting that if the company was successful, "it would deliver 'tremendous value' to the founder's key purchasers.".

On this basis, the SEC held that the NFTs constituted investment contracts and, as a result, were securities.

The Commission has ordered Impact Theory to:

💸 pay a $6.1 million fine;

🤝 make a refund to all investors who purchased these NFTs;

🔥 destroy the tokens in the company's possession and disable royalties received by the organisation for reselling on the secondary market.
 

Reaction to the case

Such a move by the SEC could not go unnoticed in the media. Thus, SEC commissioners Hester Pierce and Mark Ueda criticised the regulator's order. According to them, before bringing cases regarding NFT sales, the SEC should answer some of the questions about NFTs to clarify the regulation in this area.

The commissioners also disagree with the application of the Howey test, emphasising that the SEC "does not routinely bring enforcement actions against people that sell watches, paintings, or collectibles along with vague promises to build the brand and thus increase the resale value of those tangible items".

One of the active members of the Azuki collection community pointed at the seriousness of this case and warned holders of various NFTs that the SEC's claims may apply to other collections as well.

 

A user under the nickname FITZY.eth shared a similar opinion, highlighting that it is very common for NFTs founders to make promises just like those of Impact Theory.

 

ZachXBT, known in the crypto community for his research, recalled how he warned about the dangers of this NFT collection back in 2021 and called it a "pyramid scheme".

All of these developments coincide with the backdrop of a severe drop in interest in the NFT market, so we can only speculate about the future trajectory of the NFT world.
 

🤨 What do you think about this case? Share your opinion on our socials!

💌  Telegram, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook
 

You might also like:

What is NFT

What is going on in the NFT market

Maria Kachura
Maria Kachura

Visit her on Facebook or hit her up via Email.

0
Share this post
Similar articles
Best investment options for 2023
Markets
16 February, 2023
Best investment options for 2023
Let’s explore all the pros and cons of currencies, cryptocurrencies, stocks, real estate, and precious metals.
Cryptocurrency vs. token: what's the difference?
Learn
7 April, 2023
Cryptocurrency vs. token: what's the difference?
Let’s figure out what types of coins are there on the crypto market.
NFT NYC 2022!🌐🦄
Events
20 June, 2022
NFT NYC 2022!🌐🦄
NFT NYC 2022.
AIBC Americas 2022
Events
8 June, 2022
AIBC Americas 2022
AIBC Americas 2022.
ETH NEW YORK 2022 🌐🦄
Events
24 June, 2022
ETH NEW YORK 2022 🌐🦄
ETH NEW YORK 2022.
Blockchain Economy Istabbul Summit 2022
Events
9 June, 2022
Blockchain Economy Istabbul Summit 2022
Blockchain Economy Istanbul Summit.